Curriculum / My feedback / Week 1

Project feedback · Week 1 · Positioning one-pager

Alex — Week 1 review

Reviewed Fri 1 Aug · Ed · 11 min video + notes below ⤓ your submission
[Recorded screen review — unlisted YouTube embed · 11:07. Recorded in Loom or Slack, re-hosted for a durable embed.]

The short version: the audience definition is genuinely strong — "operations leads at 20–200-person agencies" is specific enough to write for. The channel promise underneath it is still trying to serve two audiences, and that's the thing to fix before Week 2, because packaging inherits every ambiguity you leave here.

What's working

The competitive scan is honest — you've named channels that are actually competing for your viewer's next click, not just channels in your industry. And the "one question this channel answers" line is 80% there; it just answers it for two different people.

What to change

Split paragraph two. "Helping agencies run better ops and helping freelancers go full-time" is two channels wearing one trench coat. Pick the agency audience (your proof, your network, and your offer all point there) and park the freelancer angle as a later spin-off, not a founding promise.

Do this next

Rewrite the one-pager's promise line for the agency audience only, and bring both versions to Thursday's session — we'll put the before/after on screen (say the word if you'd rather we didn't). Then start Week 2's project from the new line: the three videos you re-package should all be ones that serve it.

From your pod

PriyaThe agency-ops half is the one I'd subscribe to — I run exactly that channel search weekly and nothing good exists. The freelancer half felt like a different YouTube.
SamYour "one question" line made me rewrite mine, so thanks. Small thing: "operations leads" might undersell it — the people I know with this pain are founders doing ops badly.
Ed
Ed · Humble&Brag
Questions on this? Thread it in #cohort-1 — that way everyone gets the answer.
Mockup v3